Program correctness and incorrectness are two sides of the same coin. As a programmer, even if you would like to have correctness, you might find yourself spending most of your time reasoning about incorrectness. This includes informal reasoning that people do while looking at or thinking about their code, as well as that supported by automated testing and static analysis tools. This paper describes a logic for program incorrectness which is, in a sense, the the other side of the coin to Hoare’s logic of correctness.
Thu 23 JanDisplayed time zone: Saskatchewan, Central America change
15:35 - 16:40
|Deductive Verification with Ghost Monitors|
Martin Clochard ETH Zürich, Claude Marché Inria Saclay & Université Paris-Saclay, Andrei Paskevich LRI, Université Paris-Sud & CNRSLink to publication DOI Media Attached
|The Next 700 Relational Program Logics|
Kenji Maillard Inria Nantes & University of Chile, Cătălin Hriţcu Inria Paris, Exequiel Rivas Inria Paris, Antoine Van Muylder Inria Paris and Paris 7Link to publication DOI Media Attached File Attached
Peter O'Hearn FacebookLink to publication DOI Media Attached