Program correctness and incorrectness are two sides of the same coin. As a programmer, even if you would like to have correctness, you might find yourself spending most of your time reasoning about incorrectness. This includes informal reasoning that people do while looking at or thinking about their code, as well as that supported by automated testing and static analysis tools. This paper describes a logic for program incorrectness which is, in a sense, the the other side of the coin to Hoare’s logic of correctness.
Thu 23 Jan Times are displayed in time zone: Saskatchewan, Central America change
15:35 - 16:40
|Deductive Verification with Ghost Monitors|
Martin ClochardETH Zürich, Claude MarchéInria Saclay & Université Paris-Saclay, Andrei PaskevichLRI, Université Paris-Sud & CNRSLink to publication DOI Media Attached
|The Next 700 Relational Program Logics|
Kenji MaillardInria Nantes & University of Chile, Cătălin HriţcuInria Paris, Exequiel RivasInria Paris, Antoine Van MuylderInria Paris and Paris 7Link to publication DOI Media Attached File Attached
Peter O'HearnFacebookLink to publication DOI Media Attached